Warhammer 40K Conquest – 75-78 – Review



**3 out of 4 ain’t bad**
My Review of issues 75-78 of the Warhammer 40K Conquest subscription from hatchett partworks.
Price £7.99 (weekly)
Enjoy

Save £££ on Warhammer 40K here:
– Element Games Affiliate link: https://elementgames.co.uk/warhammer?d=10224
– Promotional code: WIL5937

Support this channel here:
https://www.patreon.com/user?u=4143405

Follow me on instagram here: https://www.instagram.com/sup3r_saiy3n/

Source

9 thoughts on “Warhammer 40K Conquest – 75-78 – Review”

  1. Definitely could have been completed with 3 issues for sure. With bigger kits like this, do you think the blue plastic made experience worse or not significantly different from regular grey plastic?

    Reply
  2. I love this subscription. It's not perfect but it's so satisyfing to put the pages into the folders and to get stuff bit by bit and overall the value is fantastic. Very autistically satisfying to an Aspie like me 😀

    Reply
  3. @11:19 Perhaps look up ''BMP-1'', historical infantry fighting vehicle, roughly the same role as the Repulsor.
    @12:44 Here's another historical example, this shows the extremely small size of the doors being used for crew members (as well as ammunition loading) https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-35e662e130701de439e09d586c920767.webp
    Just as a side note, a bigger over-sight on these models, including older kits, is that the turret ring diametres are almost always way too small to be functional as a real vehicle. Small turrets are fine as long as the turret ring diametre roughly matches the outer edges of the turret, same with the Repulsor Executioner.
    Ofcourse, I'm not really expecting Warhammer designs to make practical sense 😛

    Reply

Leave a Comment