The BEST DPS SPECS for Castle Nathria!! // World of Warcraft: Shadowlands



In this video I go through the rankings of the best DPS specs in week 1 of Castle Nathria, plus talk about how Blizzardโ€™s planned class tuning isnโ€™t enough to save โ€ฆ

Source

47 thoughts on “The BEST DPS SPECS for Castle Nathria!! // World of Warcraft: Shadowlands”

  1. Makes no sense to me a " fat owl druid" outputs more dmg than a "warrior", dont think any class needs nerfed except rogue especially for pvp they all need buffed why drag a class down just make them all equally as powerful so its skill based

    Reply
  2. Sludgefist as a warrior is horrible. You are already doing poorly, but hey now you are also forced to run around like an idiot instead of charging/leaping back. Some melee at least got their dots ticking/pet smacking the boss, while Fury got zero dots and Arms has deepwounds…

    Reply
  3. Stop being dumb asses guys this is the top 1% dps not the average wow player this info is useless unless u are in that 1%…..if you play your spec well you can still top the meters in your average raid group.

    Reply
  4. honestly 99% is kinda a bad metric to use because most of those are often parses that are overly padded, most of them are also overly luck based as well. Pretty much even a top player isn't going to hit that without lucky procs. It is typically better to use 90 or 95% which is still the top players but not overly focused on luck or look at the all percentile and look at the actual bar graphs to get a more proper idea. The problem with the 99% is that classes that have procs tend to do better in those 99% parses because they can just get a string of good luck.

    If you actually look at the parses in a proper way yes druids are still op but they are not as bad as the 1% parses makes them look.
    Now I still do think the top 5 need another 5% nerf and the bottom 5 need another 5% buff but you can't look at 1% parses to get an idea of how classes perform because so much of a 1% parse is based on luck.

    Reply
  5. Everyone getting salty when itโ€™s probably the most balanced itโ€™s ever been. Also half the players couldnโ€™t get maximum dps out of their characters anyways due to bad rotation timing. Tier lists have ruined gaming. Just love your class for what it is. Instead of crying that itโ€™s placed 6th in the rankings for a raid difficulty youโ€™ll never even step foot in…..

    Reply
  6. Feral could literally be top dps and we would still be shunned by the entire community. Got a whisper earlier this week to a dungeon app saying "Boomkin?" "no" "Well feral is trash, bye bye". Feelsbadman

    Reply
  7. I would be interested to see Feral Druids boss damage on a fight like Sire Denathrious. I wouldn't be surprised if they have the best boss damage on that fight of any spec with Apex legendary because the adds that come out feed you soooo many free bites to funnel the boss. They very well might be one of the best melee specs for that fight because they also have uncapped AoE to handle the adds while funneling the boss

    Reply
  8. Covenants dug them into another balance hellhole. My Frost DK AoE damage is off the charts rn because im Night Fae but stuff like this will not show in statistics.

    Reply
  9. Blizz needs to not nerf a lot of shit, but instead buff all of those that need it.

    Somehow tho assassination got a nerf? Like I havenโ€™t seen a single assassin rogue in SL soooooo idk why they did that

    Reply
  10. I cannot believe uhdk is finally on top of single target raids. It's actually a miracle. They got rid of our true god tier aoe status with festermight's removal and the target cap. But you can't chain a god!

    Reply
  11. Small correction, 99th percentile doesn't mean you're looking at the top 1% of parses.
    instead it means that when it's averaging out the dps for each spec, it's taking into account 99% of parses, excluding 1% of the parses that showed the highest and lowest dps numbers.
    This is a technique for studying statistical numbers that helps to see a more "realistic" representation of your averages, since edge cases of insane luck or bad luck in a rotation can throw off the averages.
    Similarly, if you look at the 97th and 95th percentile, you're looking at a even more "averaged" average, excluding the highest and lowest 3% and 5% of samples respectively,
    which might be helpful for getting a more "down to earth" look into DPS numbers for Heroic for example, as the top 2-3% of parses might be min-maxing mythic raiders, only playing specific classes/spects/leggys/trinkets, which then would not really represent the damage scaling the average raider would experience.
    Thanks for the video! I really needed a better look into how just plain average my ret paladin is ๐Ÿ˜›

    Reply
  12. I feel videos like this make WoW more of a chore rather than a game. The people doing world firsts play WoW on the ends of 15+ hours a day and do nothing else (obviously doesn't leave time to do anything else). Play the spec you like. We have both feral and balance druids – for example, and they both kick ass. If you seriously pick a spec for numbers and not how it plays, I genuinely pity you and laugh.

    Reply

Leave a Comment