Read more about Cyberpunk 2077➜ https://cyberpunk2077.mgn.tv
Just how powerful are the next-gen consoles compared to PC? We started to answer this question by looking at Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, but with the implementation of ray tracing, Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War is another fascinating test case – and the answers are surprising. Join Alex Battaglia for the full low-down.
Logitech Lightspeed Wireless sponsors Digital Foundry. Step up to the pro-grade communications and precision audio you need to win, all with the freedom and mobility of LIGHTSPEED wireless.
Buy the Logitech G733 Lightspeed Wireless headset here:
US – https://g.logi.link/lfdwr
UK – https://g.logi.link/af25k
Subscribe for more Digital Foundry: http://bit.ly/DFSubscribe
Join the DF Patreon to support the team more directly and to get access to everything we do via pristine quality downloads: https://bit.ly/3jEGjvx
Want some DF-branded tee-shirts, mugs, hoodies or pullovers? Check out our store: https://bit.ly/2BqRTt0
Source
can you do a comparison of dirt 5 2.0 patch?
For $399 machine that is incredible
okay, you can't see the difference and you should stop the game every time, using 800% of zoom to see almost nothing.
Although I love DF content, I find some of these analysis videos rather laughable at moments. I mean, it's obvious that Nvidia is pushing devs and reviewers to implement and praise ray tracing, but c'mon – 200% zoom to see "boiling shadows artifact" or a slight "dark halo effect" on random grass and bushes…Really?? While hardware being able to push all these effects at good fps costs $600+
BTW, having RX 6800 and 5900x I can run most of the games with RT enabled at 1080p60. For me, regardless what DF says, the most obvious difference/improvement when you enable RT are reflections, as you don't have to look for them in 10x zoom and stare at the walls, props and pixels (and even then, you have to be aware and actively think about reflections in order to actually notice it). After this, the next most obvious are shadows (still it's quite subtle most of the time) and finally the least obvious is ambient occlusion (for this one you need side-by-side comparisons in order to be able to tell the difference; sometimes standard non-RT AO looks better).
comparisons like this aren't fair in my book because a lot of the settings on PS5 you cant match on PC and the only settings we see on PC settings are not everything there are definitely other settings that we can't even see, those settings are tweaked and reduced to increase performance on console but for PC port developers don't follow the same pattern rather they put higher fidelity and many options are unchangeable
Yeah graphical comparison videos shouldn’t be something you watch on mobile or on anything less than the native resolution of the upload which is 4k, because I’m having a pretty hard time seeing a difference on mobile then I went to my 4k monitor and saw the differences. Obviously not huge differences but you can notice them if you look for them
The amout of work done on this video analysis is phenomenal.
I wonder how many devs are relying on these videos as part of the QA process now.
Of course the pc will be better ya bellend
First ever console generation that compares to high end PCs at the time of its release. I think we have some incredible games ahead of us this gen.
What truly matters is that you're enjoying the game on your preferred platform I'm going to be playing it on a console I don't care how it Compares on PC cuz I'm not going to spend thousands of dollars making a PC when I can spend $500 on a PS5 when I can get one
Incredible what a PS5 offers in terms of price/performance
Despite the very good price/performance ratio of brand new consoles (PS5/XOX), the console's versions of COD already inferior compared to the PC. Just remember the PS2 and PS3/X360 era, when PC hardware could not surpass the power of that consoles for the first 1-2 years …
For a $399 machine this is pretty impressive. Just wow
So has anyone found Waldo yet? In all seriousness I love these detailed breakdowns from DF, but thankfully I wouldn’t notice, or care for such minor differences in motion. Great video nonetheless 👍
so much for the power of pd5
Nahhh who will stop game n zoom every detail ..
They are Fan boys of Playstation, Xbox Series X is powerfull , and they prefere talk about ps5
Excellent work!!!
FORGET LOGITECH. I want to game with the style of Richard Ledbetter!!!!
this video is beautiful and exactly what i needed
I downloaded the HD texture pack, and it was the biggest waste of space ever, even more useless than Modern Warfare's updates. 54 GB and the visual difference is negligible under inspection, let alone during gameplay. Overall the PC performance is decent but some of the options are far too demanding. Honestly most of these options barely make a difference
Not sure if I even care!
yes and they don`t talk about the gameplay ! 🙂 every game the same shit
Only critics will scan a still Image and detail the differences. In real world use, players are running around looking at reflections and lights that look equally impressive. I think it's safe to say we all know a high end PC will look better, but console players gain entry for a fraction of the cost of what PC players will spend to see a barely noticeable differences.
11:16 thats effectively a knockoff Trabant.
PC allready looks better thsn top console…as always
PC Masterrace
Waiting for them to hit 1000% zoom.
Sony is the Best!
Most digital foundry videos have the same comments. "I can't see the difference", the difference is so minor", "you can only see the difference if you zoom in"…blah, blah, blah. The only exceptions are videos where they praise Sony exclusives…and suddenly all of these fanboys can easily see the difference and "it's massive", and "Sony exclusives are the best"… and on and on.
It's so obvious most of these comments are motivated by fanboyism. Either that or we have the most imperceptive people on the planet gathered here. But then why are Digital Foundry videos so popular?
Woah didn't expect those results. PS5 almost on par with RTX 3070 and outperforming an 2070 super. The PS5 is surprisingly strong.
But what was the resolutions?
Alex, you did a lot of work for this. But my main take away is that I can turn all my PC settings from HIGH to LOW/MEDIUM and it will look exactly the same to my eye as I'm playing the game. Haha, thanks.
Nice to see so many comments trying to invalidate this video and stroke their precious consoles. Christ.
Pc master race 😎
Nice video. But in the PC comparison chart you are basically saying that the ps5 performs almost at a 6800 level despite having half as many CUs, SUs and TMUs, while having less ROPs and bandwidth as well. Interesting. I'd love to know the reasons behind this.
12:16 holy fuck PS5 looks like Quake lmao
I remember in the PS3-era, when all PC-players got where shitty ports witth higher resolutions. but now we have almost all the options we ever wanted. so bitching does work. keep it up, fellow master-raceler! :'D
summary : just play and enjoy the game, most players don't pause between each frame and zooming in to 800% or stay at one location longer enough to notice the differences.
Wow, this is so damn petty. Look at all the trouble he went to try and show the differences in graphics. No one would notice them while playing.
Digital Foundry, why couldn't you review any game's loading times on any PC SSDs vs the PS5's SSD?
This is a perfomance test with similar settings obviously you won't see the difference. Thats not even the point of this video.
as I have 1080p screens only it took me a while to realise he is talking about 4k
Rtx3060ti is the same performance of ps5