"It's killing the game!" – Jeff Stelling explains his thoughts on VAR



► Subscribe to Sky Sports News: http://bit.ly/SkySportsNewsSub

Jeff Stelling makes it clear that he is not a fan of VAR in a clip from this weekend’s Soccer Saturday pre-show.

#SkySportsNews #SkySports #SoccerSaturday

More from Sky Sports on YouTube:

► Sky Sports Retro: http://bit.ly/SkySportsRetroSub
► Sky Sports: http://bit.ly/SkySportsSub
► Sky Sports Football: http://bit.ly/SSFootballSub
► Sky Sports Boxing: http://bit.ly/SSBoxingSub
► Sky Sports F1: http://bit.ly/SubscribeSkyF1
► Sky Sports Cricket: http://bit.ly/SubscribeSkyCricket
► Sky Sports Golf: https://bit.ly/SubscribeSkySportsGolf

Source

Categories N4G

47 thoughts on “"It's killing the game!" – Jeff Stelling explains his thoughts on VAR”

  1. I understand why some fans are frustrated with VAR. But they need to realise it's not the technology fault for bad decisions only the people using it. We had bad decisions before VAR. That's why UEFA had extra linesman which didn't work. So I think VAR is good but some changes are definitely needed for it.

    Reply
  2. “It’s the refs not the technology” said by those who’ve never been in a ground and waited 5mins for a single decision to be made, with no idea what’s actually going on. VAR & the modern offside rule, two ends of the same shitty stick.

    Reply
  3. Saying we should get rid of VAR altogether because it has a few issues is so ridiculously closed minded. The fact is, VAR has overturned far more decisions correctly than incorrectly and so has had an overall positive impact. The vast majority of perceived problems with it are actually down to rule interpretation, which has nothing to do with VAR at all. Admittedly though, the offside measurement does need to be changed to give more benefit to the attackers. I think this would best be done by introducing some level of tolerance, though Arsene Wenger's proposal, which says a players is onside if any part of their body they can play the ball with is onside, may also work. Either way, this would then take into account whether a significant advantage was gained, as opposed to ruling players offside if their toe is sticking out.

    Reply
  4. I have not watched a live game of football since Iran V portual in the world cup group stage

    VAR , ruined football as a watch
    Goal line tech ruined a game made it all buisness

    Reply
  5. honestly just scrap var apart from important fixtures eg UCL knockouts/ Fa Cup semis finals and in the world cup. can’t have another chelsea vs uefalona. but certainly can’t have son crying like a baby 24/7. there’s has to be a middle ground

    Reply
  6. It was brought in for clear and obvious errors. The jota 1 is NOT clear and obvious. Its not var its the incompetent inept officials who are making the final decisions. Its literally destroying the game we all love. Something has to change.

    Reply
  7. Something needs to change because I'm not enjoying watching football at all at the moment (and that's not solely because Arsenal are so rubbish to watch). VAR was supposed to correct clear and obvious errors – I don't understand how borderline offside decisions can fall into that category, or why the benefit of the doubt isn't given to the attacking side in such situations. It's fundamentally changing the game for the worse. Strikers have always been encouraged to play on the shoulder of the last defender and to anticipate opportunities, but now they are being penalised for being a split-second quicker than the defender and perfectly good goals are being ruled out. Look at the goal Wolves scored against Fulham last week, nobody appealed for offside, nobody saw an issue, but an excellent goal was denied because of some ridiculous lines being drawn on the screen suggesting one arm was in front of another. Whenever a referee is invited to look at the monitor it plants a seed of doubt in their mind and they begin to look for an issue that nobody spotted in the first place. VAR should solely be used for egregious incidents the referee and assistants haven't seen – off-the-ball fouls, etc. – and for everything else we should trust their judgement. Human error is part of the game; we accept it when players make occasional mistakes, why not give officials the same latitude?

    Reply
  8. The diving, constant delaying and dirty fouls has been ruining the game for 100 years, still alive, I think it will survive VAR which in fact addresses at least 2 of the biggest problems in the game

    BTW the loudest guys, are the same ones who complain after every bad REF decision…

    Only problem with VAR is the people who use it, or don't use it. And yes you can talk about the offside, but in terms of changing the rule, not removing VAR, I mean come on, does everybody has a memory of a gold fish? However many promising actions are stopped because REF don't have benefit of VAR having their back so they just wave it OFF…? How many goals are scored from clear offside positions, I'm not saying 1cm I'm saying 1m+…ref can single handedly win or lose you the game, and there's nothing he can do about because it is just so hard to judge, you can be having the best game of your life, you still loose with no fault of your own. Is that what we want?

    Reply
  9. VAR is necessary. It's the incompetent officials who make the decisions that make it the problem.
    Certain things like marginal offside are a huge positive, diving is still a huge negative ie Son v Man Utd, Fernandes v Aston Villa last season, Pogba v Aston Villa, Kane v Aston Villa and follow through tackles are actually pathetic now.
    The technology is needed, but the officials need to look back at the rules and really understand the laws again

    Reply
  10. How do bad calls become more palatable just because it's a human ref who made it.? A human ref who we now know is EXTREMELY fallible. The rules and their implementation are the problem here, overly-wrought, out-of-touch, spirit-killing rules that are being unevenly applied.

    Offside, handball, minor comings-together have all be butchered to the point where it's like we're watching a different sport. That doesn't change by doing a 180 and going back to regular old refs who we know for a fact are useless, their uselessness being one of reasons we decided we needed VAR in the first place. Love Jeff, hate his take here.

    Reply
  11. The thing is, if Son had clipped Mctominay in the face, just before playing it to Kane to score, the Man United players would be behaving the same way and Ole wouldn't be saying any comments about his son getting food.

    It's not VAR ruining the game for me, it's the dishonesty, the diving, the rolling around, I just wish referees showed a bit of common sense, I want to see a contact sport, I don't want to see grown men rolling around in agony over nothing.

    Reply
  12. Football wasn't so terrible before VAR that it was better to kill the joy of celebrating…

    Rugby use it perfectly fine, as a tool at the referees disposal. Not as judge Jury and executioner

    Reply
  13. Without VAR there are way more wrong calls and the stats back it up. Stelling is a dinosaur and completely clueless! The problem are the terrible Englisch referees. VAR isnt a problem in the Bundesliga anymore for example..

    Reply
  14. Watching football religiously since the mid 80’s and I have never been so disgruntled with our beautiful game as I am right now. Var is being used in a totally awful way that’s took all the natural emotion out of the game. Keep the goal line tech and any off the ball incidents. That’s all it needs to be used for.

    Reply
  15. The concept of rewatching things to make sure the right decisions are being made is a good idea…the problem is refs are looking and making the wrong decisions. Either the rules need to change or refs need to improve, Var should be making the game more fair not more unfair

    Reply

Leave a Comment