Minecraft 1.19.1 Pre-Release 1 Player Bans, Cooldowns & Release Date!



Minecraft 1.19.1 The Wild Update Playlist ► https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL7VmhWGNRxKixIX8tWEQn-BnYKE9AaAXk
Minecraft 1.19.1 Pre-Release 1 Changes the Allay cooldown and provides a little more information on the banning feature.

Minecraft 1.19.1 Pre-Release 1
https://www.minecraft.net/en-us/article/minecraft-1-19-1-pre-release-1

Featured In This Video
https://www.minecraft.net/en-us/community-standards
https://twitter.com/CornerHardMC/status/1537497239962038273

My Links!
💜 Main Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/user/xisumavoid
💛 Second Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/c/xisumatwo
🧡 Xisuma Says ► https://www.youtube.com/c/xisumasays
💚 Xisuma Music ► https://xisuma.co/xisumamusic
📺 Livestreams ► http://www.twitch.tv/xisuma
📝 Music Blog ► https://xisuma.blogspot.com/
🔷 Twitter ► https://twitter.com/xisumavoid
💻 Website ► http://www.xisumavoid.com

🙏 Support Xisuma Directly 🙏
💜 Membership ► https://www.youtube.com/xisumavoid/join
👍 Patreon ► https://www.patreon.com/xisuma
📺 Subscribe ► https://www.twitch.tv/subs/xisuma

0:00 Allay Cooldown & Changes
1:07 Player Banning Updates
2:21 Chat Reporting Screen
2:52 Mysterious Tweet
3:16 Release Date

#minecraft #wildupdate #prerelease

Source

49 thoughts on “Minecraft 1.19.1 Pre-Release 1 Player Bans, Cooldowns & Release Date!”

  1. If this chat reporting "feature" is landing in 1.19.X then 1.18 is the last version I will ever use. Not that Microsoft will care, but this will – in the long run – kill Minecraft. I will do 1.18 modded only thereafter. If this "feature" comes, RIP Minecraft as we know it.

    Reply
  2. The banning is stupid. It's beyond me how you aren't even allowed to play in your own single player worlds for a potential fake ban. It would be understandable if Minecraft was free like roblox which also has a ban system but on a paid game with single player it's plain stupid. Not looking forward to the wild update.

    Reply
  3. ban features like always are two sides of a coin. they are useful and good to keep creeps away from kids for example, but are also easily misused and abused with false reports and claims. especially when they are newly implemented and the balance isn't fully reached yet
    in the end it depends on how people are interacting with this feature

    Reply
  4. "No illegal content" – What's legal in one country may be illegal in another… (So, if someone has a casino mini-game and gambling is banned where someone lives, does that make the redstone contraption reportable for promoting gambling?)

    Reply
  5. Reporting and banning needs to be opt in by server owners or it is taking away the rights of those who control the servers and should be made clear to players when they join the server if it is on or off.
    Mojang has no right to ban people from all of online play just because they said something Mojang doesn't like.
    Mojang has no right to force their standards onto servers other people own and control.

    Reply
  6. If this reporting functionality is for private servers too I'm gonna learn how to write mods so I can create a mod that mandates you to install the mod. That mod will remove the reporting function. Private servers should handle their own moderation as some servers are not PG at all.

    Reply
  7. Such a ban system is horrible and is yet another company pulling the "we know best" card. Sure it fits very well in some places but in others it's absolutely a terrible idea, and it should opt-in/out or something.

    Reply
  8. This ban thing is complete trash and I hope it doesn’t get implemented, I’m not having my account since beta get banned over me telling my friend to fuck off

    Reply
  9. The ban thing really needs to be changed to work on server-by-server instead of being universal, given that each server has its own rules that may not align to what Mojang think it's appropriate.

    Reply
  10. Sharing my thoughts on the new moderation features per se would be repeating what has been said already. But I have yet to see someone rant about this:

    I consider this very poor communication on Mojang's side. They are planning to soon release a version with some powerful moderation features, but only now are "working on creating a help article that aims to add some context surrounding the functionality". In the mentioned Community Standards article, the wording looks like these features will only be utilized on Mojang-hosted and partnered servers – but we didn't know these details before. Such information should have come out along with the first news of these features. That left me (and, according to the feedback page, many others) quite confused and scared at the thought that Mojang would now moderate the communities of all servers out there.
    Best thing about this, until that context article comes out, (which might not even happen before the update – who knows!) we cannot be sure of the scope of these changes and what they actually mean for us, so far nothing too specific in that regard has come out of Mojang's mouth. Splendid.

    Reply
  11. Microsoft is definitely overstepping its bounds by giving itself the power to ban someone from all online play. It’s none of their business and it should be at the discretion of the server owner. This is how censorship begins. (I don’t like something, therefore YOU can’t do it). Personally, I’ve had enough of all this PC crap, it’s been used and abused far too much. Selling me a game should in no way entitle you to be my parent, definitely not on private servers.

    Reply
  12. I don't like the ban system. I could get banned from, for example, Hypixel, then I can't play with my friend(s) on our realm. Insane. I hope they make the ban system a tool for servers and not a requirement. I could see it being helpful, but I can also see it causing thousands of issues. Maybe instead of a ban system, they should make more parities! Make Bedrock and Java more equal.

    Reply
  13. Since when did developers start worrying about the players, for the chat? There are moderators, there are server admins who monitor security, for insults in the chat. There are commands /ban / kick / kill, etc. The developers do not know that there will be people who will use this thing for evil purposes and then it will definitely be fucked up.

    Reply
  14. Allowing private servers to opt-out of this would fix any potential concerns I can think of, however introducing real-world consequences for the most egregious offenders other than "ok switch to a different server for now" seems like a good idea in general. Minecraft's multiplayer on public servers has had a really bad reputation for a very long time for the amount of harassment and griefing people face, even on servers where it's supposedly against the rules.

    Reply
  15. The screenshot button already exists in Bedrock, the issue is that on realms you can upload screenshots in the little sharing tab, area thing, but it has only been working for talking, not screenshot uploading for over a year

    Reply
  16. Does anyone know if there was an update to minecart with chests? I found one in a mineshaft and I can't separate them. Is this a bug or something added with 1.19? I've searched and can't seem to find anything.

    Reply
  17. Given mojang’s track record, i do not trust them to be fair when banning people. It’s the server owners job to decide what the rules are for a product they are paying for. If someone is misbehaving report them to the cops, dont ban them, and if their offence isnt worth reporting to the cops or whatever law enforcement agency, then they don’t deserve to be banned. RIP 2b2t and probably many realms

    Reply
  18. The ban thing is really worrisome.

    Given the scale of Minecraft Java, the only way to implement this is automation. That's ripe for abuse. It already happens on Twitter. People pile on somebody that isn't liked for whatever reason, generally in bad faith for who or what somebody is.

    I'm transgender. My community is targeted all the time on social media in this manner. It's difficult enough to navigate past a bad-faith ban on Twitter. I can't imagine what somebody would go through trying to appeal with Microsoft.

    It seems like it would be possible to (for example) mass-report the players of one of the many servers that are managed by the LGBTQ community. Sure, people could appeal, but after a few rounds of that people would stop playing there because of course they would.

    I'm frankly concerned that somebody could spoof my player name and get me locked out of my own Realm.

    Reply
  19. To make the ban system widly accepted: Show that it is flawed, AND, will be corrected when identified.

    Have a HIGH PROFILE user of the game get banned. THEN have said user CONTEST the ban – and have MOJANG REVERT THE BAN.

    This is the same PR strategy as public vaccinations of political figures in history.

    SADLY – there is LITTLE TO NO FINANCIAL MOTIVATION TO EVER REVERT OR 2x CHECK BANS.

    As Minecraft isn't a subscription based game, erroneous bans are a financial incentive for the company. I.E. Banned players will buy new copies. Yes…this is sadly a known and used business strategy in the digital space used by AAA companies for over a decade now. Specifically this is used more often in games without a subscription service, and for 1-time purchase games.

    Reply
  20. Regardless of whether it's a good idea or not, I can't see how they're going to implement this in any kind of effective way. This just looks like a thing that will take lots and lots of paid labor to manage, but will still leave them legally exposed (probably even moreso because now they can't claim Common Carrier status) because there's no way they can catch and ban every single offender before their second egregious offense.

    Reply
  21. This ban system seems like a horrible idea to me, with no clear insights on what is a ban-able offense and what isnt. banning has been the job of server admins for years, and for good reason; what might be ban-worthy on a minigame server or a structured SMP (ie profanity, griefing, client side mods, etc) might be completely acceptable behavior on an anarchy server. I can see that in instances of hate speech, extreme harassment, etc, there might be some advantage to being able to deal with such players on a more global basis, but IMO even that problem could be handled by server admins sharing blacklists between servers

    Reply
  22. A global ban system is abysmal, i mean come on, you can report people for the stupidest things like profanity, if theres a serious problem with what a player is doing then server owners and moderators will deal with it. Whats next, reporting someone for griefing, or perhaps killing them or stealing? I have a horrible feeling this is just the tip of the iceberg. At the very least they should make this feature optional for server owners, and better yet listen to their community for once and forget it. Not to mention what happens when people realize they can exploit this? I can see it now, there are going to be people spamming reports on others that they dont like, in order to ban them. Whoevers the blockhead at mojang behind this should stuff it and leave servers be, as this destroys part of the freedom that you are promised when you buy the game.

    Reply
  23. Microsoft is going too far with that ban system. If you do shit in one server, fine. Get banned there. But this shouldn't be a thing of "banned here, banned everywhere." That's some dystopian shit

    Reply
  24. Microsoft and Mojang are working very hard to stop people from playing the game. This isn't a random decisions. This is premeditated to harm players.

    Reply
  25. All servers have their own rules, I think it's not right for Mojang to try to do moderation as this would heavily affect servers that allow swearing, caps etc.
    I really hope they listen to the community and introduce some way to toggle or opt out of this.

    Reply

Leave a Comment