Regarding Our Wonder Woman 1984 Review



Read more about Cyberpunk 2077➜ https://cyberpunk2077.mgn.tv

We just wanted to elaborate on some stuff we got wrong in our Wonder Woman 1984 Half in the Bag. Whoops.

Source

21 thoughts on “Regarding Our Wonder Woman 1984 Review”

  1. I never want movie theaters to close, such a different experience than the best widescreen, stereo TV. Want no slobs? Go to week day matinees., I do all the time, whole rows to yourself. Plus I have an Alamo Drafthouse near me, they know how to handle slobs.

    Reply
  2. Good job.

    Look guys, you don't have to force yourself to watch this dogshit. Just toss it in as a 3-minute discussion in a roundup video, and spend your time (and ours) on things worth talking about.

    Reply
  3. What? I didn't know The Blob (1988) was such a terrible film with excessive and loud CGI!
    Oh, my mistake. It's a great horror film! I also didn't see the poster. I got distracted by some new CGI pile of crap horror on the screen when you all were doing re:View. Sorry!

    Reply
  4. But also, she goes flying for several minutes… away from Washington… only to fly back to Washington to get the armour, even though she had no idea what she was up against other than guys with guns, which she has shown to be more than capable of defeating. She had no idea about Cheetah at this stage. Also, why not just make herself invisible?

    Reply
  5. WE NEED MR. PLINKETT'S WW'84 REVIEW!!!

    WE NEED MR. PLINKETT'S WW'84 REVIEW!!!

    WE NEED MR. PLINKETT'S WW'84 REVIEW!!!

    WE NEED MR. PLINKETT'S WW'84 REVIEW!!!

    WE NEED MR. PLINKETT'S WW'84 REVIEW!!!

    WE NEED MR. PLINKETT'S WW'84 REVIEW!!!

    WE NEED MR. PLINKETT'S WW'84 REVIEW!!!

    WE NEED MR. PLINKETT'S WW'84 REVIEW!!!

    WE NEED MR. PLINKETT'S WW'84 REVIEW!!!

    WE NEED MR. PLINKETT'S WW'84 REVIEW!!!

    P L E A S EEEEEEEEEEEE ! ! ! ! ! !

    😫😫😫😫😫😫😫😫😫😫😫😫😫😫

    πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™

    Reply
  6. god, Mike, you're STILL getting things wrong.

    1. The armor didn't come from a Asteria's fight on the island. It was a fight to let the Amazons escape to the island — to the boats, actually.

    2. Diana talks about trying to find Asteria and Diana directly found the armor. The armor wasn't "shipped to her" anonymously and for no reason, as you said here.

    3. You still didn't deal with when you said that you don't recall that it was implied Diana raped the man whose body they've stolen. You were out of the room again when Diana and proxy-Steve woke up in bed naked together, which is one of the Hollywood visual euphemisms for "we just had sex."

    Do us a favor and actually watch the movie. Do the job you're paid for, and watch the movie. Or refund your patreons, because you're not doing the job. You may even find you can write a more coherent review, because what you did the first time around stinks.

    For example: it's obvious that Diana would not have knowledge of Kristen Wiig getting her wish updated, so the armor makes no sense in any context that's actually given. At best they could imply that she gets her powers back slowly, just like she lost them, or the armor was originally meant for Max Powers, but the wing parts getting bent out of shape made them nonfunctional, and that's one reason she'd ditch them. Except they made the movie crescendo. Clearly there was retro-active editing and sound mixing. This is the director/writer not making up her damn mind. They just wanted the armor to set up and remind, and pay off the stinger, and that's it, and they didn't care about how they did it. that's a doable hypothesis, ain't it?

    And that's how you could've done a review. But all we got was, "wha? I missed it? this thing didn't happen (except it did you fucking idiot), so it doesn't make sense. OK next thing that I didn't get because of my own incompetence.

    Don't ever bash cinema sins, mike, now or in the future, and I hope you never have, because that was a cinema sins episode that you did.

    Reply

Leave a Comment