The Minecraft 1.19.1 Situation Keeps Getting Worse



The first 1,000 people to use this link will get a 1 month free trial of Skillshare: https://skl.sh/ibxtoycat08221

Who really owns Minecraft, the community or the developers? lol it’s microsoft actually

– The Previous Video(Why I Don’t Play Xbox Minecraft):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kd7ZtqBth2k

– Think you’ve missed something? You might have, and you can check my most recent uploads here: http://www.youtube.com/user/ibxtoycat/videos

Update Adventures (My Let’s Play):
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLe8AZ2rjfkpx5SUrbzQrqt_bwLkNxC9sD

– My Twitter: http://twitter.com/ibxtoycat
– Follow for video updates and Early News!

This Video Was Edited By:
Harrison Gray

You can become a channel member by clicking here:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_GQ4mac4oN3wl1UdbFuTEA/join

Source

29 thoughts on “The Minecraft 1.19.1 Situation Keeps Getting Worse”

  1. sounds like how health canada makes regulations, ask for community feedback to appear like theyre "listening" then proceed to ignore 100% of that feedback and spamming "wont someone think of the children!?!"

    Reply
  2. For the safety of everyone's Minecraft accounts, I highly encourage everyone to stop playing Minecraft until the forced report feature is removed entirely. Nothing grabs a company's attention faster than a heavy loss of income.

    Reply
  3. I think it is the legislation coming in both the EU and the UK that is forcing the issue. The chat moderation I think is a way of managing their legal liability. For Example If they listen to the community they will run afoul of the Online harms legislation at which point we could lose the game altogether in the UK.

    Reply
  4. At this rate, Minecraft will be a living legend that will slowly be burdened by both Microsoft and Mojang's decisions over the many years later but the question about "who owns Minecraft?" or "who's the one to blame?" can be answered into this by knowing what's the difference between a game developer and a game publisher?

    ..
    ..
    * Mojang Studios, as we know, are the main developers of Minecraft who works in association with xbox games studio team in which they took part in developing the Bedrock edition of the game.

    * Microsoft, which is the mother company and the owner of both aformentioned studios, is the sole publisher of Minecraft.

    But what both of their roles respectively?
    Obviously, Mojang (+ XGS) is the one responsible for creating the game of every aspect of it like what's the game engine is running, the gameplay and all of it's features, the soundtracks even DLCs and extras contents also but not limited to the MICROTRANSACTIONS we know and love and in-game items. Anything changes that happend in-game whatever technical or in-game is 99% Mojang doing. In contrary, the game publisher Microsoft is the one responsible for funding the game devs, marketing and advertising minecraft, seeing how it doing well in sales and managing the PR (public relation) between the organization and the audience/community.

    Microsoft isn't doing it's job efficiently on that, and always has been ever since 2009 with their horrible "Games for Windows" marketplace and the xbox one reveal at E3 2013, so is Mojang for not knowing what's right or what's wrong about inserting something into their games, like some of their previous updates or even fixing the major bugs that the bedrock team can't even fix properly. Mojang is just simply there importing Microsoft's input into Minecraft at times even though it's prohibited for MS to take any actions or put their nose into pretty much anything that revolve around the game development and what-not, reasons for that? obviously what I mentioned in the above earlier for Microsoft being the publisher and what they can and they can't do. Mojang could settle things nicely by negotiating with Microsoft about any arousing problem and agreeing for solutions that would be fit for both but instead they stay silent about it.

    Reply
  5. I completely understand why Mojang is doing this, toxic behavior is a real issue in online gaming and an issue that not everybody knows exactly how to go about or solve. But Mojang's way of doing this is completely irresponsible and does more harm than good.

    It would be such a simple system to make. You already have the chat reader, that's the hard part. Make bans on a server by server basis, make it so that servers can OPT OUT of the chat report system. Getting your entire account banned off of everything is NOT the way to punish toxicity, that just creates MORE toxicity.

    If I were Mojang, I'd implement the chat filter from bedrock as a toggleable option. So younger players parents can opt out of their children being shown harmful material. And then when it comes to toxicity, hatred, etc thats where the chat report system could come in for servers that WANT it. Not every server, servers that WANT it.

    Reply
  6. If they keep up they are gonna kill the Minecraft multiplayer community and I'd either suggest starting a petition or even a boycott if they don't listen to the community because big companies hardly ever listen to people that use or buy their product

    Edit also I run a small server for anyone to play but I'm even afraid to play it because I don't want to get banned by some player that I banned for trolling or griefing or whatever reports me for petty revenge, locks me out of managing my server and it's here where the situation occurs because mojang isn't going to know what's happening on all the servers

    I haven't played multiplayer since 1.19.1 became a snapshot I'm not taking the risk

    Reply
  7. We're talking about something that Bill Gates ultimately owns. Like I said in the other video, he doesn't give a crap about people in general and is trying to kill off half the population so why would he care about minecraft?

    Reply
  8. Speaking of the combat I really hope they get back to working on the combat tests for the next version, it feels like something else Mojang forgot about and it was probably the best combat system Minecraft ever had

    Reply
  9. kind of weird that skillshare sponsered this channel and not the second one, considering that the 2nd channel's motto is "learning about the world and stuff"

    Reply
  10. Here's my list of how they could improve it while still implementing it

    1: self moderating and no moderating:
    Servers can set themselves to self moderation or no moderation. These servers may have a little banner that says their choice, and a warning pop up box that tells you you may be at risk. Mojang can also remove self moderating status if the server doesn't, well, moderate anything.

    2: Parental controls:
    Parental controls will allow parents to choose what servers their child is allowed on. No mojang moderation needed.

    3: no permabans:
    The title says it all. Imagine if any law you break resulted in a death sentence. That's basically what doing perma-bans is, to a lower extent for sure.

    4: astrik censoring
    It worked for roblox, (kinda) so it would work for minecraft. Instead of banning immediately, just censor bad language. They could litterally just port the censoring from roblox, but maybe change it a bit

    5: split the word:
    The reasons why words like night and Nigeria aren't allowed? They both have "N-I-G" in them. Maybe they should only count the words by itself, not dissect it for any bad words within the word. Maybe then I could actually say hello in chat.

    And finally, the best answer the community wants:
    6: just don't do it:
    Servers have self moderated for years. It's been doing good, and works better than this Microsoft moderation seems like it will.

    Its really just a bad Idea in general that they could totally fix with a few things or just not implement. It's really not hard to fix this. That's my Idea, but mojang probably won't do it, at least not yet.

    Reply
  11. As someone who originally plays bedrock, one of the big reasons I never returned to bedrock years ago was the chat filters. I stayed on java multiplayer because there are no moderation except server rules.

    Now that I am an adult, I mostly play offline in my survival world due to work reasons, etc (so I can pause what I am doing, or afk without someone putting signs all over my afk spot)

    But right now, I never even wanted to go and play hypixel bedwars (I occassionally play casually from time to time) or some small smp I go to. All because of the slim possibility of getting account banned if the mandatory moderation of microsoft gets implemented. H*** I don't think I want to update past 1.19 because of this.

    And one of my biggest concern is a lot of hackers can abuse some implementations to grief, hack, and now ban someone. (One example is the "no comment" or nocom exploit in 2b2t because of a papermc vulenrability) what if someone make a hack client for new minecraft version that adds an auto report feature (which I guess already exist now…)

    Atleast mojang should make the ban temporary if they are going to ban someone (and I don't really believe the moderation is 100% human, and based of what happened in bedrock and recent event… Looks like that is the case. Not 100% human moderation)

    The reason I bought minecraft java and bedrock for myself, is because I really liked the game before when I was using a not legitimate copy of the game. Because I respected the developers and mojang for creating one of the games I loved. (But right now… I think I am regretting my decision.)

    Reply
  12. Who owns the game is one thing but who owns the server/ realm is another. Mojang doesn't have any free servers you get to play on just for buying the game. You either play on someone else's server who is paying for it in some way or you make your own server or realm and pay for that yourself. Other games have moderation features but they also have servers owned and operated by the developers

    Reply
  13. on the current path, mojang is slowly going down the path that companies like EA have where they just don't care about the players they just want the money from the game, a lot of this comes from Microsoft, but there have been multiple times that things have been stated or done that have made the experience worse or non player focused. when it comes to bans, they should be possible, but only by server owners/admins not by mojang because if a child plays Minecraft online, it is their parents job to know what they do, if they don't want the kid exposed to bad language or greifers then they don't let them play on such servers.

    they have several things they really need to change, fix, and consider before they ruin their chances with the playerbase

    they have shown a lot of cool things most update trailers and then most of it is either delayed or removed, the community votes are a cool idea but most of the concepts should still be added because most of the ones that are end up being disappointing, or they should accept concept suggestions, have people vote on them and then have people vote on the finalists and implement those concepts.

    jed stated nothing mod related would be added to Minecraft (not counting horses and some other inspirations apparently) but there are quite a few mods that would make Minecraft generally better and would at least keep the game interesting considering most of the updates to the game are only interesting for the first few times before its bland again

    here are 3 example mods I've used years ago and reasons such mods would improve it.
    Galacticraft: a lot more areas for players to explore, its features fit in well with the education edition which is good for teaching kids, and it adds in places that don't technically count as new dimensions.

    Tinkers construct: adds in a ton of ores and materials that are mostly realistic (and some false and odd ones), makes a logical and superior smelting furnace mechanic, allows many types of tools and weapons with all sorts of effects based on the differing materials used to craft them.

    Buildcraft: Pipes, pumps, tanks and all the other things are incredibly useful and cool to see. example, its more interesting to pump water or lava out of a lake into a tank for later use instead of using sponges or sand plus it works with the other mods for their fuels or liquids to do different things.

    java has commands and features bedrock doesn't such as being able to copy a build in one world, and put it in another world, structure blocks exist in both but don't work to do this in bedrock.
    Java redstone is generally better than bedrock for most things, but bedrock has a few features that java needs.

    what i see happening is eventually Minecraft will just add updates that are incomplete or have terrible features and players will be stuck with those things, or they will end up exactly like EA and Microsoft will make them charge for every thing or take full control on what they can or can't do and the player base will die.

    Reply
  14. they also took away accessibly settings for people that have migraines and motion sickness, I grew up without it. 360 gamma didn't work as intended either so basically i would only get 15 minuets to actually play the game. I worry that the modding community is going struggle because of render dragon. In all honesty I feel as if they should still be separate both are played for different reasons, bedrock is because multiplayer is easy setup while java is mostly to mod your game.

    Reply

Leave a Comment