Cyberpunk 2077 on a $5.5K GPU: NVIDIA RTX A6000, Data Science Machine vs Gamer Machine



Read more about Cyberpunk 2077➜ https://cyberpunk2077.mgn.tv

A quick video to show what happens when you play Cyberpunk 2077 on my machine learning workstation equipped with an NVIDIA RTX A6000? The frame rate is quite good at 70+ FPS; however, what does the game do with my 24-core Threadripper, 128GB system RAM, and 48GB NVIDIA RTX A6000?

My computer’s stats:

* AMD Threadripper 3960X 3.8 GHz 24-Core
* NVIDIA RTX A6000
* 128 GB (8 x 16 GB) DDR4-3200 CL16
* Sabrent Rocket 4.0 2 TB M.2-2280 NVME SSD
* 1000 WATT PSU

My video on the NVIDIA RTX A6000:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85-K7qTSvS8

The NVIDIA RTX A6000:
https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/design-visualization/rtx-a6000/

** Follow Me on Social Media!
GitHub: https://github.com/jeffheaton
Twitter: https://twitter.com/jeffheaton
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/jeffheatondotcom/
Discord: https://discord.gg/3bjthYv
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jeffheaton

Source

29 thoughts on “Cyberpunk 2077 on a $5.5K GPU: NVIDIA RTX A6000, Data Science Machine vs Gamer Machine”

  1. Might I recommend some reinforcement learning to train an AI to drive in Cyberpunk 2077 for you, Jeff? Might be more interesting than traditional sandbox reinforcement learning. And yes… I'm just green with jealousy. I can't get my hands on an nVidia 30-series for the life of me.

    Reply
  2. I’m sorry but at 4:41 did you basically just say Windows is not a “real operating system”? 😂 I was like uhm wait what? Did he just slip that in there? Said it so matter of fact too. I like Windows but that was awesome.

    Reply
  3. We may need to start a WallStreetBets-style reddit for people who go YOLO and buy outrageous desktops with their own cash. That Threadripper plus A6000 combo is crazy insane. Sadly it's probably the only setup available for retail at the moment. We are more likely to win the Powerball lottery than score a 3090 at original MSRP at this point .

    Reply
  4. For gaming the 3090 is still better. "While the Nvidia RTX A6000 has a slightly better GPU configuration than the GeForce RTX 3090, it uses slower memory and therefore features 768 GB/s of memory bandwidth, which is 18% lower than the consumer graphics card (936GB/s), so it will not beat the 3090 in gaming. Meanwhile, because the RTX A6000 has 48GB of DRAM onboard, it will perform better in memory-hungry professional workloads."

    https://www-tomshardware-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.tomshardware.com/amp/news/nvidia-rtx-a6000-48gb-benchmarked?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQFKAGwASA%3D#aoh=16130673872954&csi=0&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tomshardware.com%2Fnews%2Fnvidia-rtx-a6000-48gb-benchmarked

    Reply
  5. $4,649 launch price. It has the full GA102 (628 mm²) core but lower memory speed 16 Gbps vs 19.5 Gbps. In summary I spect best case scenario exactly same performance as the RTX 3090, worse case scenario a little bit slower. I wonder if that ECC memory is better (or worse) for overclocking though!

    Reply

Leave a Comment